Minutes of the meeting held on 28th January 2001 at the Roman Catholic
Chaplaincy Centre, University of Exeter, Glenthorne Road, Exeter by kind
invitation of Fr.David Friend.
1. Present: John Bradley (Methodist), Annette Burkitt (Pagan Federation),
Bishop Michael Doe (C of E - D.of Bristol), George Firsoff (Independent
Pagan), David Friend (RC), Aubrey Hill (S of F & Rep.at SWRAssembly), Jill
Hopkins (S of F), Jan Mughrabi (Bahai), Heather Pencavel (SW Churches),
David Raynor (DETR/ICRC), Heather Savini (Methodist),Kevin Tingay (C of E -
D.of Bath & Wells).
Apologies were received from a number of persons who were unable to attend.
2. Bishop Michael Doe agreed to chair the meeting and Kevin Tingay to be
the minute secretary.
3. Aubrey Hill reported on matters with which he had been involved as
Representative in the Regional Assembly.
He distributed copies of the membership of the list of Social and Economic
Partners. Copies of the Constitution of the assembly and of the S & E
Partners are available on request.
He reported on a meeting of the Social Inclusion Sub-group of the S & E P;
on changes that had been suggested to the Regional Sustainable Development
Framework (A Sustainable Future for the South West) with particular
reference to - Health and well-being, Regional inequality and access to
services, sustainable communities, culture and heritage; on a meeting of
the Regional Development Agency, minutes and papers of which can be
accessed on Click here
He drew attention to a report by the Social Exclusion Unit - A New
Commitment to Neighbourhood Renewal A National Strategy Action Plan.
4. David Rayner addressed the meeting on the work of the Inner Cities
Religious Council, a forum set up under the auspices of the Department of
the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
He spoke on the involvement of the Faith Communities in public life.
Responses from public bodies varied greatly and was often dependent on the
attitudes of individual functionaries. There was no clear attitude from
Central Government and no consistency between the Regions of the UK.
In London, under the GLA Act, regional institutions have discretion to
consult. If they do so then faith communities (described as religious
groups in the Act) must be included. The ICRC were asked to suggest a means
to do this. They advised that the leaders of nine faith might be so
consulted. This resulted in the establishment of the Pan London
Consultation Group on Faiths. This experience may have implication for the
Regions.
The London Civic Forum is a grass roots response from many groups in the
Voluntary Sector. Individual and/or groups from the Faith Communities can
join this.
Attempts to set up a West Midland Forum were frustrated by difficulties
raised by civil servants.
David saw possibilities for for the Faith Communities to co-operate with
Local Authorities in 'Local Strategic Partnerships', but local and regional
initiative were likely to be at the mercy of the apparent arbitrariness of
decisions by public bodies. Faith Communities can sometimes act as 'honest
brokers' in community development projects.
He drew attention to the report of the Conference held in Birmingham on
12th June 2000 on Interfaith Co-operation, Local Government and the
Regions. Published by the Interfaith Network at �3.50 + �1.25 pp.
A guide to good practice in relationships with Local Authorities and public
bodies was in the course of preparation. All LA Chief Executives had been
asked by the Local Government Association to respond. The Community
Development Foundation web site will have the draft text.
A document setting out relationships between Central Government and the
Community and Voluntary Sector. It can be found on the web at
Click here
Opportunities for faith groups to link themselves with developing networks
can be found on the web. A list of some web sites is appended to these
minutes.
In the North West proposals for an Inter Faith Tourism project were in the
course of consideration as a sustainable business project.
A discussion followed on the implications of David's presentation, in
particular on the function of Faith Communities in injecting moral and
ethical concerns on to the agenda of Local and Regional Public Bodies.
David was thanked for making the journey to Exeter and giving the meeting
so much information. Further information can be had
Here
5. Heather Pencavel initiated a discussion on the matter of representation
on the SWCF from the Christian Churches and from the Asian Faith
Communities; on the nature of questions that might be raised by the Council
in the Regional structures; and on the dissemination of information from
and between religious groups in the Region. We were reminded on the need to
realistic about expectations on what the Council could achieve given the
limited human resources available and absence of financial backing from the
groups represented.
6.Kevin Tingay agreed to meet with Heather to discuss how minimum
administrative support for the Council might be provided.
7. The South West Forum, whose membership was being re-established, was
having a Conference in Bristol on the 28th February on Reconstructing
Society.
8. Heather reported that some �480M was being allocated to a 'Children's
Fund', and that a Multi Modal Study on an 'Integrated Approach to
Transport' was in process. She will report back on any developments that
might have relevance to the Council.
9. Jan Mugrabi asked if it might be possible to produce a Calendar of Inter
Faith Events. It was felt that the Council did not have the resources to
produce one for the region at the present time. Various educational bodies
such as SHAP produced annual calendars of festival and significant dates
and local interfaith groups attempted to liase at the grass roots level.
10. The next meeting was fixed for Saturday 26th May from 11am to 3pm at
the Catholic Chaplaincy Centre at the University of Exeter.
Heather has listed the following useful websites which can be clicked on here:
|